Showing posts with label pacific war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pacific war. Show all posts

We Were Pirates: A Torpedoman's Pacific War Review

We Were Pirates: A Torpedoman's Pacific War
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
When I picked up We Were Pirates I expected a firsthand account of the Pacific War with a ghost writer and what I found was that two men have edited and woven Chief Robert Hunt's diary into We Were Pirates. While well written I found myself wishing I was reading Chief Hunt's diary with commentary by Chief Hunt. At one point Hunt by mistake fires a torpedo then the authors kept on talking about a leak in the torpedo room. It seems likely that the torpedo went through the outer torpedo tube door and damaged the tube causing the leak but the authors lack of knowledge of submarines is shown here. The authors spend too much time on Hunt's time ashore and not enough exploring the war patrols or bringing in other material supplementing Hunt's diary. the pressures of the war patrols would be far more helpful than the exploits of Chief Hunt's letting off steam. The purpose of a good History is to explore causes in order to understand the consequences, I found myself skipping over the beach portions of the book.
The end of the book became difficult to read because the main author Robert Schultz goes into first person account of hero worship for Chief Hunt and while interesting the purpose of reading this book is to know about Chief Hunt experiences not Dr. Schultz's. It is a very irritating trend in recent histories to have the author imbed themselves into the narrative. In the end it was an easy read but a book that I can't say added much to the submarine history library. It is a shame we couldn't have Chief Hunt's words and experience firsthand.

Click Here to see more reviews about: We Were Pirates: A Torpedoman's Pacific War

A sailor's extraordinary experiences on an American submarine in the Pacific are candidly reported in this eyewitness account of war from a torpedoman's perspective. Robert Hunt managed to survive twelve consecutive war patrols on the submarine USS Tambor. During the course of the war, Hunt was everywhere that mattered in the Pacific. He stood on the bow of the Tambor as it cruised into Pearl Harbor just days after the devastation of the Japanese air raid, peered through binoculars as his boat shadowed Japanese cruisers at the Battle of Midway, ferried guns and supplies to American guerilla fighters in the Philippines, fired torpedoes that sank vital Japanese shipping, and survived a near-fatal, seventeen-hour depth-charge attack. For exceptional skill and proficiency at his battle station Hunt received a commendation from Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz. This WWII torpedoman's account of the war offers the rare perspective of an enlisted seaman that is not available in the more common officer accounts. To capture and recount the progress of the Pacific War through Hunt's eyes coauthors Robert Schultz and James Shell examined the young submariner's war diary, as well as crew letters, photographs, and captains' reports, and they also conducted hours of interviews. Their vivid descriptions of the ways in which sailors dealt with the stress of war while at sea or on liberty show a side of the war that is rarely reported. The fact that Hunt's submarine was the first of a new fleet of World War II boats and the namesake of a significant class adds further value to his remarkable story.

Buy NowGet 36% OFF

Click here for more information about We Were Pirates: A Torpedoman's Pacific War

Read More...

If Mahan Ran the Great Pacific War: An Analysis of World War II Naval Strategy Review

If Mahan Ran the Great Pacific War: An Analysis of World War II Naval Strategy
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
There are many books telling what happened in individual battles or to particular ships. This book tries to grade the thinking of those who determined where forces went into battle and why.
Mostly it succeeds at describing the strategic goals and thinking (or lack thereof!) of the admirals in charge of the Pacific War on both sides. Yamamoto gets failing grades for not ensuring that his brilliant and risky gambles were sufficiently followed through; King gets consistently fairly high grades; a number of characters on both sides are criticized for various flaws.
One flaw in this book is the over-use of hindsight; the author judges various strategic ideas as if everyone should have understood at the time things that did not become clear until much later; for instance, the total dominance of the aircraft carrier over the battleship, or the inability of high-altitude bombers to hit anything in motion. He several times criticizes admirals for not understanding that their cherished goal should only have been the means to an end (e.g., Ugaki's desire to take Guadalcanal) but does not realize that his somewhat repetitive chanting of "Never divide the fleet" or "Sink the carriers" are both ends toward maintaining control of the sea. (He probably should at least have looked at some of Sir Julian Corbett's criticisms of Mahan's work.)
That said, there are many excellent gems of observation, and quite a lot of good analysis, in the book. To experienced naval strategists, they will come as no surprise; to the vast majority of the human race and Pacific War buffs who are not, this will be a very useful learning course. Readers will probably want some previous acquaintance with the history of World War II in the Pacific, but given such acquaintance this is a challenging and rewarding analysis.
Highly recommended.

Click Here to see more reviews about: If Mahan Ran the Great Pacific War: An Analysis of World War II Naval Strategy



Buy NowGet 27% OFF

Click here for more information about If Mahan Ran the Great Pacific War: An Analysis of World War II Naval Strategy

Read More...

War Shots: Norm Hatch and the U.S. Marine Corps Combat Cameramen of World War II Review

War Shots: Norm Hatch and the U.S. Marine Corps Combat Cameramen of World War II
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
I have known of the great work of Norm Hatch for many years. He was the right man in the right place at the right time...and he still is. I worked most of my USMC career with writers/photographers and eventually for a "Mr" Norm Hatch (Major, USMCR, Retired) in DoD audio-visual news for about 18 months before retiring for civilian life. I especially admire the way Jones and he handle the great responsibilities explained in the book: with humility despite tremendous responsibility by a then-young, relatively inexperienced sergeant in his first combat. Strongly recommend this great book to everyone who appreciates American History.

Click Here to see more reviews about: War Shots: Norm Hatch and the U.S. Marine Corps Combat Cameramen of World War II

* Story of how military photographers got their shots while storming beaches and assaulting pillboxes with combat troops * Hatch filmed With the Marines at Tarawa, which won the 1944 Academy Award for Best Documentary Short Subject * New details on the controversy surrounding the famous photo of the flag raising on Iwo Jima * Hatch was Person of the Week on ABC World News with Diane Sawyer in March 2010 * For fans of Flags of Our Fathers, Letters from Iwo Jima, and HBO's The Pacific

Buy NowGet 29% OFF

Click here for more information about War Shots: Norm Hatch and the U.S. Marine Corps Combat Cameramen of World War II

Read More...

The Pacific War: The Strategy, Politics, and Players that Won the War Review

The Pacific War: The Strategy, Politics, and Players that Won the War
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Hopkins has assembled a commendable work that links the most important battles of the Pacific with the US strategy, the politics, and the personalities that shaped the Pacific theater. He provides the backgrounds for each major step and takes you through the events at a level sufficient to put it into the broader perspective.
You won't find content regarding technology or the tactics of specific battles. Hopkins puts a timeline to these seemingly disparate events of this theater to give the reader appreciation for the decisions of MacArthur, Nimitz, Halsey, Marshall, and Roosevelt. But he does it in a very readable way. The many maps help as well. I also enjoyed the brief descriptions of the smaller battles which haven't yet warranted their own books (which made me feel sorry for the many who perished fighting these battles without any real historical recognition).
Having read individual personal recounts of individual battles or campaigns in the Pacific, I was pleased that Hopkins has delivered a very readable history that brings it all together. I'm not a historian who remembers each fact, so I can't comment on Hopkin's accuracy. But its sufficient for a reader to "get" the US Pacific strategy and timeline, and to enjoy doing so.
I've avoided other books spanning the Pacific theater that are tomes with small print and too much detail, or those which seem to have the authors political slant. "Retribution" comes to mind. If you've enjoyed reading books about Tarawa, Guadacanal, Peleliu, Okinawa, Iwo, then you'll appreciate what Hopkins has accomplished.

Click Here to see more reviews about: The Pacific War: The Strategy, Politics, and Players that Won the War

Once the stories have been told of battles won and lost, most of what happens in a war remains a mystery. So it has been with accounts of World War II in the Pacific, a conflict whose nature is only obscured by the linear narrative. In this book, a veteran and respected military author opens the story of the Pacific War to a broader and deeper view.

Going beyond the usual accounting, William B. Hopkins investigates the strategies, politics, and personalities that shaped the conduct of the war. His regional approach to this complex war conducted on land, sea (and significantly by America, undersea), and air offers a more realistic perspective on how this multifaceted conflict unfolded--in many ways, and on many fronts. As expansive as the immense reaches of the Pacific, and as focused as the most intensive pinpoint attack on a strategic island, this account offers a whole new way of understanding the hows--and more significantly, the whys, of the Pacific War.

Buy NowGet 24% OFF

Click here for more information about The Pacific War: The Strategy, Politics, and Players that Won the War

Read More...

Wings of Gold: The U.S. Naval Air Campaign in World War II Review

Wings of Gold: The U.S. Naval Air Campaign in World War II
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
I am a serious student of World War Two and a Gerald Astor fan, however repeated errors in aircraft designations...(SPD instead of SBD) caused me to hesitate to finish this work. There is nothing more annoying than having to mentally correct poor editing.
The books content is very good and worth reading. I just would like to stress that whomever edits the final draft need to be sure that it is properly done.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Wings of Gold: The U.S. Naval Air Campaign in World War II



Buy Now

Click here for more information about Wings of Gold: The U.S. Naval Air Campaign in World War II

Read More...

Hell to Pay: Operation DOWNFALL and the Invasion of Japan, 1945-1947 Review

Hell to Pay: Operation DOWNFALL and the Invasion of Japan, 1945-1947
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
I enjoy reading about WW11 and war strategy especially interests me.
D.M. Giangreco is a respected writer and has a deep knowledge of his subject. He has written an impressive account of what the United States planned to do had the war not ended when it did.
America planned an enormous invasion of Japan. The book gives us inside details of how both sides prepared for this invasion. Operation Downfall, as it was called, would have made D-Day look minute. Had the bombs not been dropped that ended the war, what would have happened, as described in this book, would have changed the course of history. It would have shed much more blood and the war been a much larger and deadlier war than it was.
If you ever questioned the correctness of the decision to drop the Atom bomb that ended the war, reading this book is likely to change your mind. That turned out to be a wise decision. The alternative would have been almost unthinkable --- yet it was going to happen between 1945 and 1947 as described in this book.
It has been said that Japan was trying to surrender in 1945. This book lays that, and other myths to rest. If you're interested in WW11 and if you want to know the truth about its end and the plans that were in place to demolish the enemy had it not ended as it did, when it did, you'll want to read this book. It's a valuable resource and a most interesting read.
Highly recommended.
- Susanna K. Hutcheson

Click Here to see more reviews about: Hell to Pay: Operation DOWNFALL and the Invasion of Japan, 1945-1947



Buy NowGet 34% OFF

Click here for more information about Hell to Pay: Operation DOWNFALL and the Invasion of Japan, 1945-1947

Read More...

Allies and Adversaries: The Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Grand Alliance, and U.S. Strategy in World War II Review

Allies and Adversaries: The Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Grand Alliance, and U.S. Strategy in World War II
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
"Allies and Adversaries: The Joint Chiefs of Staff, The Grand Alliance, and U.S. Strategy in World War II" by Mark A. Stoler is a tour-de-force piece of military history, certainly of the highest academic standard. One can usually tell how 'serious' a work of military history is by what types of sources are used by the author for information and how many. Of the 380 pages of Stoler's book nearly 100 are set aside for 'notes' and bibliography - a more obvious sign of 'how much' research Stoler did would be pointless. So is this merely secondary sources and posturing? No not by a long shot. Stoler utilizes a variety of source materials, from unpublished works, to archival material, personal interviews, and published works (book and journal forms). As an academic scientist this reviewer can appreciate solid literature work and Stoler has certainly done that. Is "allies and Adversaries" merely a thoroughly researched book, or does it have literary flare and depth of new insight?
Let's address the literary competence of Stoler's work. The quick of it: solid but not lilting. Unfortunately many works of this 'academic' depth can be extremely dry and quite unreadable. Stoler's book is very readable. Yet, Stoler does a good job weaving an interesting story that brings together disparate sources into a prose that maintains the readers interest. This is not however to say this is a 'pick it up but can't put it down' book. The text is a bit dry but given the subject matter - strategy and statesmanship in the context of war - this may not be surprising. To his credit Stoler proves adept at keeping a good pace and telling a story that is enjoyable if not riveting.
So what about insights? Does Stoler's 'deep' research yield new information worthy of this depth? In short: probably. Clearly Stoler presents a thorough picture of how, when and why major (above theatre level) strategic decisions were made in the Second World War. Moreover, Stoler provides considerable information about who was making decisions and influencing those decision makers. Where the work suffers is from lack of much tangible information relative to the Soviet and British decision making processes. Stoler can probably be forgiven for the formers omission but certainly there is material to be had relative to the British side. A quick read of another work - "American Strategy in World War II: A Reconsideration" - centered on high strategy of WWII written shortly after the war by Kent Roberts Greenfield will clearly illustrate that the basic story presented by Stoler has been documented for decades. Where Stoler has added is in the depth of presentation. Plenty of new material is presented here, clearly justifying the legwork put into this study.
In the final analysis Mark Stoler has generated a very readable and extremely solid piece of historical literature. Serious students of WWII should consider picking up a copy of this book to see the bigger picture - that far beyond the foxhole that put men in the foxholes wherever and whenever they were. As a serious piece of historical work "Allies and Adversaries" is a 5 star effort.


Click Here to see more reviews about: Allies and Adversaries: The Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Grand Alliance, and U.S. Strategy in World War II

During World War II the uniformed heads of the U.S. armed services assumed a pivotal and unprecedented role in the formulation of the nation's foreign policies. Organized soon after Pearl Harbor as the Joint Chiefs of Staff, these individuals were officially responsible only for the nation's military forces. During the war their functions came to encompass a host of foreign policy concerns, however, and so powerful did the military voice become on those issues that only the president exercised a more decisive role in their outcome.
Drawing on sources that include the unpublished records of the Joint Chiefs as well as the War, Navy, and State Departments,Mark Stoler analyzes the wartime rise of military influence in U.S. foreign policy. He focuses on the evolution of and debates over U.S. and Allied global strategy. In the process, he examines military fears regarding America's major allies--Great Britain and the Soviet Union--and how those fears affected President Franklin D. Roosevelt's policies, interservice and civil-military relations, military-academic relations, and postwar national security policy as well as wartime strategy.

Buy Now

Click here for more information about Allies and Adversaries: The Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Grand Alliance, and U.S. Strategy in World War II

Read More...

Hellcat Tales: A U.S. Navy Fighter Pilot in World War II Review

Hellcat Tales: A U.S. Navy Fighter Pilot in World War II
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
It's real in that it talk's about training and that seem's to be a big part of any book about military flying. I would have like to read more about training and what signal's were used to communicate in the air as far as lining up for formation flying on a CAP. I believe novices would appreciate this info. Also, the LSO signal's that were used to bring a plane aboard the boat.
It's a good general info book on becoming a Naval Aviator during WWII.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Hellcat Tales: A U.S. Navy Fighter Pilot in World War II



Buy Now

Click here for more information about Hellcat Tales: A U.S. Navy Fighter Pilot in World War II

Read More...

Battleships: United States Battleships, 1935-1992 Review

Battleships: United States Battleships, 1935-1992
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Bill Garzke and Bob Dulin have outdone themselves again. When I was the structural project leader to direct the hull and armor redesigns for the reactivation of the Battleship NEW JERSEY at Long Beach Naval Shipyard (the planning yard for the Battleships), we used their earlier edition of this book as our general guide. Two members of my design team brought in their personal copies and kept them handy so I could include excerpts from them for official Navy memos and instructions. The Naval archives were sorely lacking detailed chemical and heat treating records of the Class A and Class B armor of the Battleships. A quick phone call to Bill Garzke gave me an armor expert on the west coast that had all the data our designers and welding engineers needed. Thanks, Bill. I owe you one. The only thing I have found missing from this edition is the fantastic Gibbs & Cox scheme D Battleship that was half Battleship and half Aircraft Carrier and was actually bought by the Soviet Union in WW II, but never built. In this edition, perhaps the most important section is the one devoted to the disasterous incident of turret II on the IOWA where 47 men were killed. The authors go into meticulous detail as to actual facts and almost every conceivable theory as to what caused the deflageration (not an explosion). However, they are properly cautious as not to force their personal opinions on the reader. Yet they give enough detail, including histories of past turret incidents on other Battleships, so the reader can draw his own conclusions. There are a few typos and descrepancies between the text and the illustrations. For example, the text correctly identifies the powder in the propellent bags as D846 where the illustrations identify it as B846. Also, the elevation sketch indicates that the heavily armored turret bustle hatch was blown off when in fact it was the turret bustle hatch ACCESS PLATFORM below the bustle (overhang) that was blown over the side. But these are miniscule descrepancies only an "insider" like me would know (I was tasked to write a repair procedure). All in all, it is unthinkable that any true Battleship historian or lover would be without this book. Actually, both the 1976 and this 1995 edition should be in every Naval Architect's library. Richard A. Landgraff DREADNAUGHT CONSULTING Long Beach, California

Click Here to see more reviews about: Battleships: United States Battleships, 1935-1992



Buy NowGet 39% OFF

Click here for more information about Battleships: United States Battleships, 1935-1992

Read More...

America's Fighting Admirals: Winning the War at Sea in World War II Review

America's Fighting Admirals: Winning the War at Sea in World War II
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
The American naval actions of the second world war were some of the most dramatic in the history of sea warfare, taking place over the Atlantic and Pacific oceans alike with an admiral overseeing each action and battle. The battles are here described from the perspective of American admirals who fought them and comes from a World War II navy veteran who not only covers all major campaigns and admiral leaders, but analyzes strategy and decision-making challenges during battle. Serious World War II military collections, particularly those with strong naval history sections, need AMERICA'S FIGHTING ADMIRALS: WINNING THE WAR AT SEA IN WORLD WAR II.

Click Here to see more reviews about: America's Fighting Admirals: Winning the War at Sea in World War II



Buy NowGet 27% OFF

Click here for more information about America's Fighting Admirals: Winning the War at Sea in World War II

Read More...

The Great Pacific War Review

The Great Pacific War
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
A great story, written in 1927, that forsaw the possibility of a Japanese sneak attack on the United States. Maybe the details aren't quite right, but they are damned good considering the flow of future history, including the major role aircraft and submarines would play in the next great war. An excellent story.

Click Here to see more reviews about: The Great Pacific War



Buy Now

Click here for more information about The Great Pacific War

Read More...

Reaper Leader: The Life of Jimmy Flatley Review

Reaper Leader: The Life of Jimmy Flatley
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
After six decades as a superpower, it may be hard for Americans to remember what a terribly small band of warriors stood between the United States and those wishing to do us harm in 1941.
The entire Navy then had fewer than a thousand fighter planes, some of them useless in modern combat, and only a cadre of pilots. Fortunately, although the military had been starved of men, machines and money, the American system was flexible, expandable and resilient. Among its few superb leaders was Jimmy Flatley.
He didn't look intimidating. Overwork and cigarettes kept his weight down to 120 pounds for most of World War II. But he was a thinker, a fighter, a teacher and a leader. When he led his aviators into combat -- his most famous group was the Grim Reapers -- they were a team.
Though outnumbered, in the early days, by the superbly trained and greatly experienced Japanese aviators, the Americans proved superior overall, in large part because of their political and moral system.
While the Japanese created difficulties for themselves, the Americans were notable for working their way around difficulties placed in the way by others. In Flatley's career, the notable example was his debate with the other great fighter leader of the Pacific war, Jimmie Thach, over the four-plane or six-plane interceptor division.
Although the difference may appear to be trivial, aerial combat was a matter of thin advantages, and Thach's idea -- the famous "Thach weave" -- proved vital, especially during the period when the Americans flew slower, less handy planes.
Flatley initially doubted Thach, but, in what biographer Steve Ewing says was characteristic of his moral courage, once persuaded, he admitted he had been wrong -- very publicly wrong -- and worked to educate the rest of the Navy.
Flatley was a positive man in every way. He once wrote a friend that he had "some very definite ideas and . . . the confidence of my own convictions."
He was right more than he was wrong, but his promotion to admiral was delayed because some brass hats thought he talked too much.
In the early '50s, when the Navy was struggling to adapt to the jet age, it was Flatley who changed the Navy's attitude to aviation safety. As a result, deaths dropped from one every 18 hours to one every 18 weeks.
Ewing says some other officers considered Flatley had saved naval aviation and that his peacetime safety leadership was even more important than his wartime heroics.
At every turn, Ewing emphasizes not Flatley's exciting battles but the qualities that allowed Flatley to lead his men successfully through them.
Flatley's outlook was conventional, a walking version of the Boy Scout oath. He was intelligent but not much of a standout in the classroom, steady, honorable. Nobody ever thought him profound.
To the public, he was one of the best-known naval aviators, a tireless speaker and writer.
His career as a publicist portrayed the defects of his virtues. A sort of premature McCarthyite, his frequent lectures on geopolitics were half-baked. Ewing attributes his opinions to "reading prominent newspapers," but he must have picked up many of his ideas from Roman Catholic sermons, more bellicose in those days than what we hear today. Flatley was a Holy Joe, and Ewing says his men, even if not religiously inclined themselves, respected him for his forthright preaching.
Flatley made an appealing personality -- tireless, a genuine war hero, a faithful and sober family man, he was what the bishops were looking for but didn't get when they adopted Joe McCarthy. There is little doubt that he would have been offered help to a national political career after retirement from the Navy -- which would have placed him on the stage at the height of John Kennedy's popularity -- but the cigarettes caught up with him when he was only 52.
A gentle man personally, and adopted as a surrogate father by many sailors when he rose to command ranks, Flatley never flinched from the violence of his calling. He was the ultimate professional, at a time when his country needed professionals more than anything else.
As Ewing says in summing up, "Anyone who knew Jimmy recognized he was always at war."


Click Here to see more reviews about: Reaper Leader: The Life of Jimmy Flatley

Although Jimmy Flatley had much to do with the U.S. victory over Japan, few outside the close-knit naval aviation community have heard his colorful story. A naval hero in every sense of the word according to former Chief of Naval Operations Admiral James L. Holloway III, Flatley was a formidable fighter pilot in combat, an inspiring leader, and a gifted operational planner. Flatley's combination of talents are fully examined in this biography and reveal why he was so vital to the war effort. Known to his squadron mates at Guadalcanal as "Reaper Leader," Flatley--with Jimmy Thach and Butch O'Hare--was instrumental in communicating tactical advice throughout naval aviation and changing the perception that the supposedly inferior F4F Wildcat fighter was actually superior to the Japanese Zero when properly utilized. His biographer, Steve Ewing, also explains how Flatley's combat experience established the credibility necessary for a middle grade officer to initiate sweeping changes in naval aviation both at the front and with the entrenched naval establishment.The author credits Flatley's persistence and credibility for successes at Guadalcanal, Leyte Gulf, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa. In post-war years these same qualities helped him make naval aviation what it is today by again challenging the status quo and effecting sweeping and significant changes in naval aviation safety. This biography is the second in a planned naval aviation trilogy that when complete will include the three notable carrier fighter tacticians in the Pacific war--Thach, O'Hare, and Flatley.

Buy NowGet 20% OFF

Click here for more information about Reaper Leader: The Life of Jimmy Flatley

Read More...

THE "WARSPITE": THE FIGHTING LIFE OF THE ROYAL NAVY'S BRAVEST BATTLESHIP (WARSHIPS OF THE ROYAL NAVY) Review

THE WARSPITE: THE FIGHTING LIFE OF THE ROYAL NAVY'S BRAVEST BATTLESHIP (WARSHIPS OF THE ROYAL NAVY)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
I really enjoyed this book. The author did a fine job of giving us insight into the career of a very distinguished battleship, perhaps the most active fighting battleship ever. (A battleship is a large heavily armored steel warship with big guns in turrets, built between 1873 and 1944). I recommend this book for anyone interested in battleships. I found it to be a good value.

Click Here to see more reviews about: THE "WARSPITE": THE FIGHTING LIFE OF THE ROYAL NAVY'S BRAVEST BATTLESHIP (WARSHIPS OF THE ROYAL NAVY)



Buy Now

Click here for more information about THE "WARSPITE": THE FIGHTING LIFE OF THE ROYAL NAVY'S BRAVEST BATTLESHIP (WARSHIPS OF THE ROYAL NAVY)

Read More...

The Reluctant Admiral: Yamamoto and the Imperial Navy Review

The Reluctant Admiral: Yamamoto and the Imperial Navy
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
This was a wonderful book which went into alot of detail about the life of Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto. He was a much more complex person than most people think. He was no ranting imperialistic flunky. In fact, he held most of those types in contempt. So much so, that he had to maintain constant vigilance because of death threats. However, he did his duty, as he was ordered to do, even though he knew the futility of it. He was also totally against the building of the Yamato and Musashi battleships. Utter "folly" he called them and a waste of time and money. He truly believed that the future of war would be aviation. He was proved right. Its really too bad that he was killed, he would have been of great benefit to the restructuring of the new Japanese government. Anyone interested in a more "personal" look of one of the greatest Admirals in the world, will love this book, like I did.

Click Here to see more reviews about: The Reluctant Admiral: Yamamoto and the Imperial Navy



Buy Now

Click here for more information about The Reluctant Admiral: Yamamoto and the Imperial Navy

Read More...

Corvettes of the Royal Canadian Navy: 1939-1945 Review

Corvettes of the Royal Canadian Navy: 1939-1945
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
I have read this book several times. The authors give a clear picture of the Corvette's history; as a class of warship,regarding its development and modification during the war. I heartily recommend the book for its historical perspective. Its store of photographs for the historian and especially for the modeller of that great little ship.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Corvettes of the Royal Canadian Navy: 1939-1945

No other warship is so intimately connected with Canada'snaval heritage as the ubiquitous corvette of WWII.Despite theimportance of the corvette to Canadian history, no reliable history ofthe class has ever been published.This book is a concise and popularaccount of the corvette in Canadian service during WWII.

Buy Now

Click here for more information about Corvettes of the Royal Canadian Navy: 1939-1945

Read More...

Carrier Air War in Original WWII Color: US Navy Air Combat 1939-1946 Review

Carrier Air War in Original WWII Color: US Navy Air Combat 1939-1946
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
I have read nearly every book on the subject and this is the definitive best. Espically the illustrations. There is something about seeing the aircraft in color that makes them come alive. I reccomend this book to any fan of the Second World War.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Carrier Air War in Original WWII Color: US Navy Air Combat 1939-1946



Buy Now

Click here for more information about Carrier Air War in Original WWII Color: US Navy Air Combat 1939-1946

Read More...

Agents of Innovation: The General Board and the Design of the Fleet that Defeated the Japanese Navy (Blue Jacket Bks) Review

Agents of Innovation: The General Board and the Design of the Fleet that Defeated the Japanese Navy (Blue Jacket Bks)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
This original book is focused on the role that the U.S. Navy General Board had in designing and, to the extent possible, building a U.S. Navy capable of meeting and defeating the Imperial Japanese Navy in WWII. The General Board was created in 1900 to advise the Secretary of the Navy on technical matters related to naval ship design, construction, and armament. In practice the Board functioned as a component of what was in all but name the Navy General Staff. The Board was dissolved in 1950 when changing command structures made it redundant.
By Kuehn's account the most important service of General Board came during that period of uneasy peace between the end of WWI and the start of WWII. His argument, which he supports quite well, is that in spite of imposed treaty limitations and chronic shortages of funds, the Board cooperated with the Naval War College, the Chief of Naval Operations(CNO), and the Navy Bureaus (e.g. Bureau of Aeronautics) to build a powerful modern navy entirely capable of meeting the challenges of WWII. Perhaps one of the most surprising points he makes is that the Board did not seek consensus, but cooperation and mutually developed solutions to problems involving a wide spectrum of naval issues.
During the inter-war period, the General Board was a powerful advocate for a strong navy and was composed at times of the CNO, the President of the Naval war College , the Chief of Naval Intelligence, and the Commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps. Remarkably although most senior U.S. Naval Officers at the time were 'battleship men', the Board consistently demonstrated a clear understanding of vital role that naval aviation would play in future fleet encounters. Probably the most difficult problem that these intelligent and prescient officers had to solve was how to provide the Pacific Fleet with adequate forward support bases in the Western Pacific. Under the Washington Naval Treaty the U.S. was forbidden to build effective, fortified full service naval bases in the Western Pacific or to improve the few existing bases already built there. This forced them to reconsider their strategic (Orange) plans for war with Japan and to develop various innovations to extend the range and effectiveness of the Pacific Fleet. The most far reaching and original of these innovations was the 'Mobile Base Project' (MBP) which incorporated floating dry docks and a carefully crafted logistic support system that proved itself in WWII. All in all not a bad record for the Board or the U.S. Navy.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Agents of Innovation: The General Board and the Design of the Fleet that Defeated the Japanese Navy (Blue Jacket Bks)



Buy NowGet 24% OFF

Click here for more information about Agents of Innovation: The General Board and the Design of the Fleet that Defeated the Japanese Navy (Blue Jacket Bks)

Read More...